<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Poll: Pligg Eligable or Not For Packt Most Promising CMS Award?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://socialcmsbuzz.com/pligg-eligable-or-not-for-packt-most-promising-cms-award-30112009/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://socialcmsbuzz.com/pligg-eligable-or-not-for-packt-most-promising-cms-award-30112009/</link>
	<description>Latest News and Information for social CMS systems</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 Mar 2011 13:27:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Lincoln</title>
		<link>http://socialcmsbuzz.com/pligg-eligable-or-not-for-packt-most-promising-cms-award-30112009/comment-page-1/#comment-5836</link>
		<dc:creator>Lincoln</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 12:49:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://socialcmsbuzz.com/?p=2717#comment-5836</guid>
		<description>Hey Rafher,

Lie is a strong word to use and completely inaccurate, sure we have caused some controversy but all our articles are researched before publication, unlike your comments it would seem. 

YADC (Yet Another Digg Clone) was in fact the first release by AshDigg Pligg&#039;s original Developer which then went on to become Social Web CMS ;) Ash released YADC to the community which solved all the security vulnerabilities in v9.9.0 of pligg which pligg users were screaming out for a fix, more so to keep the pligg project going at the time Pligg&#039;s owners actually lifted a lot of Ash&#039;s fixes form YADC/SWCMS and pasted them into their own SVN release of pligg. Taking the code Ash had done for YADC is what actually allowed pligg to release v9.9.5 of their system to the public ;)

http://socialcmsbuzz.com/pligg-beta-v995-released-or-should-we-call-it-yadc-01082008/

Below is a quote from the release article we wrote after AshDigg contatcted us about YADC where you will see the facts.

http://socialcmsbuzz.com/yadc-a-fork-of-the-pligg-cms-system-launches-its-beta-1-release-31072008/

&lt;blockquote&gt;YADC is a fork of the popular Pligg CMS System and has been developed by Pligg’s former lead developer AshDigg.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

If we are anything here at social cms buzz we are not lairs and are considered the saviors for Pligg. :) 

It&#039;s true that our articles actually kick started pligg development again after v9.0.0 being dormant for around eight months since Ash originally decided to leave the pligg project.

So again YADC which is SWCMS is not and never was out project, hopefully this explanation will help to clear up the inaccuracies in your comments for you ;)

As for SWCMS failing well you obviously don&#039;t keep up to date or have no real interest in keeping abreast of developments on Open Source Social Systems within the community other than trolling/baiting comments to post crude inaccurate replies, http://forums.socialwebcms.com/index.php?topic=882.0.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Rafher,</p>
<p>Lie is a strong word to use and completely inaccurate, sure we have caused some controversy but all our articles are researched before publication, unlike your comments it would seem. </p>
<p>YADC (Yet Another Digg Clone) was in fact the first release by AshDigg Pligg&#8217;s original Developer which then went on to become Social Web CMS <img src='http://socialcmsbuzz.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' />  Ash released YADC to the community which solved all the security vulnerabilities in v9.9.0 of pligg which pligg users were screaming out for a fix, more so to keep the pligg project going at the time Pligg&#8217;s owners actually lifted a lot of Ash&#8217;s fixes form YADC/SWCMS and pasted them into their own SVN release of pligg. Taking the code Ash had done for YADC is what actually allowed pligg to release v9.9.5 of their system to the public <img src='http://socialcmsbuzz.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p><a href="http://socialcmsbuzz.com/pligg-beta-v995-released-or-should-we-call-it-yadc-01082008/" rel="nofollow">http://socialcmsbuzz.com/pligg-beta-v995-released-or-should-we-call-it-yadc-01082008/</a></p>
<p>Below is a quote from the release article we wrote after AshDigg contatcted us about YADC where you will see the facts.</p>
<p><a href="http://socialcmsbuzz.com/yadc-a-fork-of-the-pligg-cms-system-launches-its-beta-1-release-31072008/" rel="nofollow">http://socialcmsbuzz.com/yadc-a-fork-of-the-pligg-cms-system-launches-its-beta-1-release-31072008/</a></p>
<blockquote><p>YADC is a fork of the popular Pligg CMS System and has been developed by Pligg’s former lead developer AshDigg.</p></blockquote>
<p>If we are anything here at social cms buzz we are not lairs and are considered the saviors for Pligg. <img src='http://socialcmsbuzz.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  </p>
<p>It&#8217;s true that our articles actually kick started pligg development again after v9.0.0 being dormant for around eight months since Ash originally decided to leave the pligg project.</p>
<p>So again YADC which is SWCMS is not and never was out project, hopefully this explanation will help to clear up the inaccuracies in your comments for you <img src='http://socialcmsbuzz.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>As for SWCMS failing well you obviously don&#8217;t keep up to date or have no real interest in keeping abreast of developments on Open Source Social Systems within the community other than trolling/baiting comments to post crude inaccurate replies, <a href="http://forums.socialwebcms.com/index.php?topic=882.0" rel="nofollow">http://forums.socialwebcms.com/index.php?topic=882.0</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rafher</title>
		<link>http://socialcmsbuzz.com/pligg-eligable-or-not-for-packt-most-promising-cms-award-30112009/comment-page-1/#comment-5827</link>
		<dc:creator>Rafher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 00:03:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://socialcmsbuzz.com/?p=2717#comment-5827</guid>
		<description>Lincoln,

You might want to review your own website. You are again caught in another lie.

You personally released a fork of Pligg called YADC. 

It failed. We know it, your readers know it. Just you don&#039;t know it. 

You took it personally. Spent 2 years of your life trying to make Pligg look bad. Just look at your blog. You are a disgrace to the open source community
 
Still after a few years you are still Anti-Pligg. 

Your readers feel sorry for you. 

Maybe you should google open source doucebag.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lincoln,</p>
<p>You might want to review your own website. You are again caught in another lie.</p>
<p>You personally released a fork of Pligg called YADC. </p>
<p>It failed. We know it, your readers know it. Just you don&#8217;t know it. </p>
<p>You took it personally. Spent 2 years of your life trying to make Pligg look bad. Just look at your blog. You are a disgrace to the open source community</p>
<p>Still after a few years you are still Anti-Pligg. </p>
<p>Your readers feel sorry for you. </p>
<p>Maybe you should google open source doucebag.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Geoserv</title>
		<link>http://socialcmsbuzz.com/pligg-eligable-or-not-for-packt-most-promising-cms-award-30112009/comment-page-1/#comment-5823</link>
		<dc:creator>Geoserv</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 20:21:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://socialcmsbuzz.com/?p=2717#comment-5823</guid>
		<description>I also voted &quot;Yes&quot;, up until version 1.0, Pligg has always used the beta word and always said that 1.0 would be the first &quot;stable&quot; version.

Gotta love when people comment on blogs without even reading the posts.

For some reason, even when you say something good about Pligg, people still get defensive.

As far as SWCMS, I too can vouch that Ashdigg actually started that, much like he coded the majority of Pligg, people submitting code or helping other developers is typically a good thing, but only other developers would understand that.

@Jakub Holásek, nice to see around my friend, hope all is well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I also voted &#8220;Yes&#8221;, up until version 1.0, Pligg has always used the beta word and always said that 1.0 would be the first &#8220;stable&#8221; version.</p>
<p>Gotta love when people comment on blogs without even reading the posts.</p>
<p>For some reason, even when you say something good about Pligg, people still get defensive.</p>
<p>As far as SWCMS, I too can vouch that Ashdigg actually started that, much like he coded the majority of Pligg, people submitting code or helping other developers is typically a good thing, but only other developers would understand that.</p>
<p>@Jakub Holásek, nice to see around my friend, hope all is well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lincoln</title>
		<link>http://socialcmsbuzz.com/pligg-eligable-or-not-for-packt-most-promising-cms-award-30112009/comment-page-1/#comment-5816</link>
		<dc:creator>Lincoln</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 12:53:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://socialcmsbuzz.com/?p=2717#comment-5816</guid>
		<description>Hey guys,

As you will see if you actually bothered to read and understand the article I agree that Pligg SHOULD have been included, so whats you complaint here as their doesn&#039;t seem to be one? Also on the matter of SWCMS the so called fork that we tried to put out that&#039;s also incorrect, Social Web CMS was a project started by Pliggs original developer AshDigg that we contributed some code to, we didn&#039;t start the project or own any part of it we simply contributed to it as we do with a lot of open source CMS systems. ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey guys,</p>
<p>As you will see if you actually bothered to read and understand the article I agree that Pligg SHOULD have been included, so whats you complaint here as their doesn&#8217;t seem to be one? Also on the matter of SWCMS the so called fork that we tried to put out that&#8217;s also incorrect, Social Web CMS was a project started by Pliggs original developer AshDigg that we contributed some code to, we didn&#8217;t start the project or own any part of it we simply contributed to it as we do with a lot of open source CMS systems. <img src='http://socialcmsbuzz.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jakub Holásek</title>
		<link>http://socialcmsbuzz.com/pligg-eligable-or-not-for-packt-most-promising-cms-award-30112009/comment-page-1/#comment-5814</link>
		<dc:creator>Jakub Holásek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 09:42:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://socialcmsbuzz.com/?p=2717#comment-5814</guid>
		<description>Critism is good. But Pligg is STILL very good Social Bookmarking CMS. With skilled developer there is no problem to customize own Pligg site to specific needs (including more antispam power).
As a matter of fact it seems Lincoln attempts to throw mud at Pligg as much as possible, playing up negatives only..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Critism is good. But Pligg is STILL very good Social Bookmarking CMS. With skilled developer there is no problem to customize own Pligg site to specific needs (including more antispam power).<br />
As a matter of fact it seems Lincoln attempts to throw mud at Pligg as much as possible, playing up negatives only..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rafher</title>
		<link>http://socialcmsbuzz.com/pligg-eligable-or-not-for-packt-most-promising-cms-award-30112009/comment-page-1/#comment-5809</link>
		<dc:creator>Rafher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 01:36:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://socialcmsbuzz.com/?p=2717#comment-5809</guid>
		<description>Pligg 1.0 was released on 6-16-2009
Could your hatred towards Pligg be because you tried to put out a fork and it sucked?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pligg 1.0 was released on 6-16-2009<br />
Could your hatred towards Pligg be because you tried to put out a fork and it sucked?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/


Served from: socialcmsbuzz.com @ 2012-05-22 12:46:54 -->
