<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Pligg Beta v9.9.5 Released Or Should We Call It YADC?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://socialcmsbuzz.com/pligg-beta-v995-released-or-should-we-call-it-yadc-01082008/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://socialcmsbuzz.com/pligg-beta-v995-released-or-should-we-call-it-yadc-01082008/</link>
	<description>Latest News and Information for social CMS systems</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 Mar 2011 13:27:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Yet More Proof Of Pligg Ripping Code Straight From Social Web CMS Project&#8217;s SVN &#124; Social CMS Buzz</title>
		<link>http://socialcmsbuzz.com/pligg-beta-v995-released-or-should-we-call-it-yadc-01082008/comment-page-2/#comment-2643</link>
		<dc:creator>Yet More Proof Of Pligg Ripping Code Straight From Social Web CMS Project&#8217;s SVN &#124; Social CMS Buzz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Aug 2008 15:05:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://socialcmsbuzz.com/?p=521#comment-2643</guid>
		<description>[...] You can see some proof of the Pligg Teams Actions with the screenshot&#8217;s in the original article we wrote titled &#8220;Pligg Beta v9.9.5 Released Or Should We Call It YADC?&#8220;. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] You can see some proof of the Pligg Teams Actions with the screenshot&#8217;s in the original article we wrote titled &#8220;Pligg Beta v9.9.5 Released Or Should We Call It YADC?&#8220;. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Mackey</title>
		<link>http://socialcmsbuzz.com/pligg-beta-v995-released-or-should-we-call-it-yadc-01082008/comment-page-2/#comment-2590</link>
		<dc:creator>David Mackey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2008 14:05:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://socialcmsbuzz.com/?p=521#comment-2590</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the mention. I actually have significant other code contributions to make to Pligg in additional to the inline editor (and, of course, YADC is free to use these contributions as well). Amongst them are anonymous commenting (like blog commenting), fixes to RSS Importer v. 0.6, a revamped ajax based admin. section on each story allowing kill spam/discard/queue/publish directly from the story when logged in as an admin, a static cms so we can get rid of a bunch of php/tpl files and instead use dynamic db pages with static urls...Anyways, I just want to reiterate that I am eager to work with all parties involved and to see a reconciliation occur. Its evident that a lot of feelings have been hurt and I am sure some serious missteps have been made by individuals on occasion - but perhaps we can find a way to re-unify?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the mention. I actually have significant other code contributions to make to Pligg in additional to the inline editor (and, of course, YADC is free to use these contributions as well). Amongst them are anonymous commenting (like blog commenting), fixes to RSS Importer v. 0.6, a revamped ajax based admin. section on each story allowing kill spam/discard/queue/publish directly from the story when logged in as an admin, a static cms so we can get rid of a bunch of php/tpl files and instead use dynamic db pages with static urls&#8230;Anyways, I just want to reiterate that I am eager to work with all parties involved and to see a reconciliation occur. Its evident that a lot of feelings have been hurt and I am sure some serious missteps have been made by individuals on occasion &#8211; but perhaps we can find a way to re-unify?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pligg Beta v9.9.5</title>
		<link>http://socialcmsbuzz.com/pligg-beta-v995-released-or-should-we-call-it-yadc-01082008/comment-page-2/#comment-2586</link>
		<dc:creator>Pligg Beta v9.9.5</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2008 03:05:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://socialcmsbuzz.com/?p=521#comment-2586</guid>
		<description>[...] Pligg Beta v9.9.5 Released Or Should We Call It YADC? &#124; Social CMS Buzz PliggBroadcast Pligg Template [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Pligg Beta v9.9.5 Released Or Should We Call It YADC? | Social CMS Buzz PliggBroadcast Pligg Template [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pligg v9.9.5 New Captcha Bypass Security Exploit Found &#124; Social CMS Buzz</title>
		<link>http://socialcmsbuzz.com/pligg-beta-v995-released-or-should-we-call-it-yadc-01082008/comment-page-2/#comment-2577</link>
		<dc:creator>Pligg v9.9.5 New Captcha Bypass Security Exploit Found &#124; Social CMS Buzz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Aug 2008 19:55:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://socialcmsbuzz.com/?p=521#comment-2577</guid>
		<description>[...] the hurried and somewhat controversial release of Pligg v9.9.5 to fix some really bad security exploits it has come to light today that a new exploit has been [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the hurried and somewhat controversial release of Pligg v9.9.5 to fix some really bad security exploits it has come to light today that a new exploit has been [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy</title>
		<link>http://socialcmsbuzz.com/pligg-beta-v995-released-or-should-we-call-it-yadc-01082008/comment-page-2/#comment-2576</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Aug 2008 16:48:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://socialcmsbuzz.com/?p=521#comment-2576</guid>
		<description>What the hell is going on?

It was great news that Pligg had finally taken some decisive steps to get to grips with the security features of their CMS. but now this thread...

This like the Mambo split that lead to Joomla.

As I was about to upgrade my Pligg site (no easy feat with all the moderations), I&#039;m now not sure to go with Pligg or Yadc... 

I&#039;ll hold out for a couple of days and see what happens....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What the hell is going on?</p>
<p>It was great news that Pligg had finally taken some decisive steps to get to grips with the security features of their CMS. but now this thread&#8230;</p>
<p>This like the Mambo split that lead to Joomla.</p>
<p>As I was about to upgrade my Pligg site (no easy feat with all the moderations), I&#8217;m now not sure to go with Pligg or Yadc&#8230; </p>
<p>I&#8217;ll hold out for a couple of days and see what happens&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SimonSays</title>
		<link>http://socialcmsbuzz.com/pligg-beta-v995-released-or-should-we-call-it-yadc-01082008/comment-page-2/#comment-2575</link>
		<dc:creator>SimonSays</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Aug 2008 12:37:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://socialcmsbuzz.com/?p=521#comment-2575</guid>
		<description>I think the point here brian is how much pligg bullshit their community to try and keep a false face for the project, the classic every things fine here bullshit. There are no issues with sharing code if your truthful about it but to seem to take code from a fixed system that was released earlier in the day, then tell you community you hired a third party coder is not on. 

Pligg = Censorship, Lies and a who world of Bullshit. I wouldn&#039;t trust anything these guys have said this blog has proved to be a better source for finding out whats really going on adn for that i am grateful.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the point here brian is how much pligg bullshit their community to try and keep a false face for the project, the classic every things fine here bullshit. There are no issues with sharing code if your truthful about it but to seem to take code from a fixed system that was released earlier in the day, then tell you community you hired a third party coder is not on. </p>
<p>Pligg = Censorship, Lies and a who world of Bullshit. I wouldn&#8217;t trust anything these guys have said this blog has proved to be a better source for finding out whats really going on adn for that i am grateful.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bbrian017</title>
		<link>http://socialcmsbuzz.com/pligg-beta-v995-released-or-should-we-call-it-yadc-01082008/comment-page-2/#comment-2566</link>
		<dc:creator>bbrian017</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Aug 2008 22:15:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://socialcmsbuzz.com/?p=521#comment-2566</guid>
		<description>So if pligg is in the wrong this means Ash was the original developer? I think Yankidank is the originally develop and to be honest I don&#039;t see any issues with sharing the &quot;Open Source &quot; code with pligg if that&#039;s what really happened!

I will keep an eye on both these projects! Pligg and YADC!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So if pligg is in the wrong this means Ash was the original developer? I think Yankidank is the originally develop and to be honest I don&#8217;t see any issues with sharing the &#8220;Open Source &#8221; code with pligg if that&#8217;s what really happened!</p>
<p>I will keep an eye on both these projects! Pligg and YADC!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rainman</title>
		<link>http://socialcmsbuzz.com/pligg-beta-v995-released-or-should-we-call-it-yadc-01082008/comment-page-2/#comment-2564</link>
		<dc:creator>rainman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Aug 2008 20:50:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://socialcmsbuzz.com/?p=521#comment-2564</guid>
		<description>When i visited this thread earlier today i came from a link on the pligg forums, i returned to see if any more replies had been made and that post seems to have been deleted now and the topic closed. Why are Pligg censoring content and avoiding answering any questions?.

I noticed that the trackback from the original post at pligg i visited from is still present above and show&#039;s what page the link to the article was on.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When i visited this thread earlier today i came from a link on the pligg forums, i returned to see if any more replies had been made and that post seems to have been deleted now and the topic closed. Why are Pligg censoring content and avoiding answering any questions?.</p>
<p>I noticed that the trackback from the original post at pligg i visited from is still present above and show&#8217;s what page the link to the article was on.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lincoln</title>
		<link>http://socialcmsbuzz.com/pligg-beta-v995-released-or-should-we-call-it-yadc-01082008/comment-page-2/#comment-2562</link>
		<dc:creator>Lincoln</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Aug 2008 16:41:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://socialcmsbuzz.com/?p=521#comment-2562</guid>
		<description>Hi Rogelio,

At the moment no they won&#039;t unfortunately and the pligg developers haven&#039;t as yet released details of any changes made to the beta for template creators to modify their themes. 

We are currently in the process of converting all our themes to run on the YADC system and you can get more information about template upgrades &lt;a href=&quot;http://socialcmsbuzz.com/community/yadc-templates-f35.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Rogelio,</p>
<p>At the moment no they won&#8217;t unfortunately and the pligg developers haven&#8217;t as yet released details of any changes made to the beta for template creators to modify their themes. </p>
<p>We are currently in the process of converting all our themes to run on the YADC system and you can get more information about template upgrades <a href="http://socialcmsbuzz.com/community/yadc-templates-f35.html" rel="nofollow">here</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rogelio</title>
		<link>http://socialcmsbuzz.com/pligg-beta-v995-released-or-should-we-call-it-yadc-01082008/comment-page-2/#comment-2559</link>
		<dc:creator>Rogelio</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Aug 2008 14:21:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://socialcmsbuzz.com/?p=521#comment-2559</guid>
		<description>will this beta work correctly with the templates from this blog?
Somebody test it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>will this beta work correctly with the templates from this blog?<br />
Somebody test it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/


Served from: socialcmsbuzz.com @ 2012-02-09 08:52:51 -->
